Quantcast
Channel: EViews
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 24142

From Troll to Eviews

$
0
0
Hi, point taken :-).

But, I get the same problem with the equation
d(LOG(yp1519 / (1 - yp1519)) , 1) = YPR1519 + YPrcon1519 + Ypcon1519(1) + Ypcon1519(2) * DUM883 + Ypcon1519(3) * DUM912 + Ypcon1519(4) * DUM962 + Ypcon1519(5) * DUM994 + Ypcon1519(6) * DUM061 + Ypcon1519(7) * dum081 + Ypcon1519(8) * d(LOG(yp1519(-1) / (1 - yp1519(-1))) , 1) + Ypcon1519(9) * d(LOG(yp1519(-2) / (1 - yp1519(-2))) , 1) + Ypcon1519(10) * d(LOG(yp1519(-3) / (1 - yp1519(-3))) , 1) + Ypcon1519(11) * d(LOG(yp1519(-4) / (1 - yp1519(-4))) , 1) + Ypcon1519(12) * LOG(yp1519(-1) / (1 - yp1519(-1))) + Ypcon1519(13) * d(LOG(URKORR(-4)) , 1) + Ypcon1519(14) * LOG(URKORR(-2)) + Ypcon1519(15) * d(LOG(WWK(-2) * (1 - TGW(-2)) / KPI(-2)) , 1) + Ypcon1519(16) * LOG(WWK(-1) * (1 - TGW(-1)) / KPI(-1))

Is it not possible to write an equation in a model as the one above without respecifying it?



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 24142

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>