Hi Steve, here is some result
Eviews version 22 feb
workfile: range 1-1000, objects: 10 000, size 79,7 mb
1 Linux-server, network
Test 1.1 USEFILEBUFFER(TRUE)
A: save: 68 seconds
B: open: 3 seconds
Test 1.2 USEFILEBUFFER(FALSE)
A: save: 68 seconds
B: open: 40 seconds
2 local drive (c:\temp)
Test 2.1 USEFILEBUFFER(TRUE)
A: save: 1 seconds
B: open: 0 seconds
Test 2.2 USEFILEBUFFER(FALSE)
A: save: 1 seconds
B: open: 0 seconds
3 Linux-server, network and local drive
Test 3.1 USEFILEBUFFER(TRUE)
A: save on local drive, copy via batch from local drive to network: 4 seconds
B: copy via batch from network to local drive, open on local drive: 2 seconds
Test 3.2 USEFILEBUFFER(FALSE)
A: save on local drive, copy via batch from local drive to network: 4 seconds
B: copy via batch from network to local drive, open on local drive: 3 seconds
Comments
When using USEFILEBUFFER(TRUE) it's must faster to open file (compare 1.1B with 1.2B). The result in 1.1B is similar to the result in 3.1B and 3.2B
It's still slow to save file on netowork and diffrent options in USEFILEBUFFER does not seem to have any affect. It's must faster to save on local drive and then copy to network (see 3.1A and 3.2A)
It would be nice with another "file saving class" (or something), like the new "file reader class"
Regards Johan
Eviews version 22 feb
workfile: range 1-1000, objects: 10 000, size 79,7 mb
1 Linux-server, network
Test 1.1 USEFILEBUFFER(TRUE)
A: save: 68 seconds
B: open: 3 seconds
Test 1.2 USEFILEBUFFER(FALSE)
A: save: 68 seconds
B: open: 40 seconds
2 local drive (c:\temp)
Test 2.1 USEFILEBUFFER(TRUE)
A: save: 1 seconds
B: open: 0 seconds
Test 2.2 USEFILEBUFFER(FALSE)
A: save: 1 seconds
B: open: 0 seconds
3 Linux-server, network and local drive
Test 3.1 USEFILEBUFFER(TRUE)
A: save on local drive, copy via batch from local drive to network: 4 seconds
B: copy via batch from network to local drive, open on local drive: 2 seconds
Test 3.2 USEFILEBUFFER(FALSE)
A: save on local drive, copy via batch from local drive to network: 4 seconds
B: copy via batch from network to local drive, open on local drive: 3 seconds
Comments
When using USEFILEBUFFER(TRUE) it's must faster to open file (compare 1.1B with 1.2B). The result in 1.1B is similar to the result in 3.1B and 3.2B
It's still slow to save file on netowork and diffrent options in USEFILEBUFFER does not seem to have any affect. It's must faster to save on local drive and then copy to network (see 3.1A and 3.2A)
It would be nice with another "file saving class" (or something), like the new "file reader class"
Regards Johan