I will just reiterate briefly,
After taking a break, and coming back to the problem after a few weeks I was hoping that having a fresh look would help me see something I may have been missing.
However, I'm still confused as to why my scatter graph looks the way it does. If you look inside equation "eq01" the coefficient on educ is .1309, p=.0000. However, the scatter of the actuals against educ seems a little counter intuitive. I'd expect there to be more clustering of dots around low x & low y, and high x and high y.
I'm assuming that's the method used to create the visual that I included in the first post of this thread, although that may be part of the reason it's not working, is I may be assuming too much. However that visual doesn't look too terribly complicated, just a scatter with the probit s shaped cumulative, from what I can tell.
If anyone else has made headway, feel free to share
![:)]( "Smile")
After taking a break, and coming back to the problem after a few weeks I was hoping that having a fresh look would help me see something I may have been missing.
However, I'm still confused as to why my scatter graph looks the way it does. If you look inside equation "eq01" the coefficient on educ is .1309, p=.0000. However, the scatter of the actuals against educ seems a little counter intuitive. I'd expect there to be more clustering of dots around low x & low y, and high x and high y.
I'm assuming that's the method used to create the visual that I included in the first post of this thread, although that may be part of the reason it's not working, is I may be assuming too much. However that visual doesn't look too terribly complicated, just a scatter with the probit s shaped cumulative, from what I can tell.
If anyone else has made headway, feel free to share
